August 21, 2023

Deadline 2050: How Chemical Companies Can Navigate the Energy Transition

Chemical businesses are one of top three carbon-emitting industries, and among the most difficult to decarbonise. There is, however, growing pressure on companies to quickly find routes to a low carbon future. Emissions disclosure is becoming stricter, with the focus shifting to indirect upstream and downstream emissions (Scope 3), which for chemicals represent around 75% of their total emissions. 
The sector is also contending with numerous short-term challenges as it embarks on this journey. Crippling energy prices, price volatility and cooling consumer demand are compressing margins, forcing many companies to resort to significant cost pass-through to customers. Others have taken emergency measures, including the temporary shutdowns of factories. However, these obstacles should not delay the implementation of sustainable decarbonisation solutions; failing to act now can put a company’s long term competitive position in risk. 

Thinking creatively about decarbonization strategies

Because of the industry’s carbon intensiveness, initiatives to cut emissions often involve a complete rethink of energy supply strategies and require large capital investments. These decisions are complicated by the fact that chemical businesses operate in a highly competitive and commoditised international market, where any increase in operating costs can put a company at a significant disadvantage. Furthermore, while a company may be prepared to look through the short-term risks, it often doesn’t have the balance sheet strength to invest in a dedicated renewable energy supply chain.  
Given these challenges, companies must think innovatively about decarbonisation and how to use vertical integration, cross sector and supply chain joint ventures as well as partnerships with financial investors to achieve their energy transition objectives.

Investment in clean energy supplies at the core 

While a lot of uncertainty remains about the future costs of the energy system in the net-zero economy, one thing that is clearer is that they will no longer be determined by global prices. Instead, the development of national “green” power systems will be the major influence on the availability and price of low-carbon energy. 

Industrial policy plays a key role here: a case in point is the US’ Inflation Reduction Act, a huge green energy subsidy package that is expected to boost investment in carbon-free power generation, with the potential to bring renewable energy costs below those of fossil-based sources. In countries with less advanced renewable strategies, costs are likely to remain high for some time.

In this new environment, developing exclusive access to local green energy supply becomes critical for competitiveness. The move allows companies greater control of the cost base and enhanced supply chain resilience, setting businesses apart from other players in the market. 

Recent partnerships show what’s possible 

Some businesses are already taking steps into that direction and increasing their integration into the value chain. This can happen either by leveraging their own value chain position through significant captive power consumption capabilities or via strategic partnering with energy providers, investors and upstream actors.

Recent examples include BASF’s purchase of a stake in Vattenfall’s offshore windfarm Hollandse Kust Zuid (HKZ) with Allianz Capital Partners joining as financial co-investor later. The project, which once fully operational will be the world’s largest offshore windfarm, will enable BASF to implement low-emission technologies at several of its production sites in Europe. 
Another case is Fertiberia, a portfolio company of private equity firm Triton with strong ESG focus, and Iberdrola’s joint investment in a €150 million electrolyser facility to produce green hydrogen in Spain. The hydrogen will be used by Fertiberia in its fertiliser plant, reducing its natural gas needs and to commercialize green fertilisers.

The impact of newly evolving business models can also be observed in the case of Nobian, a Netherlands-based chemicals company that has recently joined forces with Macquaire Asset Management’s Green Investment Group (GIG) to create a hydrogen solutions business. 

How to engage effectively with value chain and financial partners

As well as securing a more resilient supply along the chain, partnering approaches offer several financial benefits for the chemical companies. It can significantly reduce the cost of capital needed to build the infrastructure, given that the cost of capital for such projects is typically significantly higher for industrial players compared to infrastructure funds. 

From the funds’ perspective, strong ESG demand from institutional investors makes it appealing to invest in projects related to the energy transition. Money flowing into sustainable strategies continues to grow at pace, with Blackrock recently announcing a $7 billion  fund to invest in climate-focused projects.  
Companies looking to engage effectively with financial partners and their relatively cheap capital should focus on the following three steps:

1. It is first necessary to create the investment opportunity. This implies leveraging the company’s position in the value chain and their energy consumption in order to design an attractive investment case. 
2. Key considerations include the size of the investment, the access to market, the maturity of the technology, the inclusion of public funding mechanisms and the competitiveness of the downstream energy offtake. 

3. The partnership strategy needs to take into account the impacts of the vertical integration and related investments on both balance sheets and share performance. In recent years, many chemical firms have adopted an asset-light business model as a means to achieve better returns to their shareholders, so any strategy needs to address this through shareholding and financial structuring.
 
By designing projects with these aspects in mind a chemical business can become an attractive partner for financial investors and secure the low cost renewable energy supply chain that the company needs in order to deliver the net-zero ambitions at the scale and pace required. 
 

Related Insights
Global professional services firm Alvarez & Marsal (“A&M”) today announces the findings of its latest analysis and predictor of shareholder activism in Europe in 2022, the “A&M Activist Alert”, or “AAA”.
Global professional services firm Alvarez & Marsal (“A&M”) today announces the findings of its latest analysis and predictor of shareholder activism in Europe, the “A&M Activist Alert”, or “AAA”. This snapshot edition of the study has identified 59 U.K. corporates that are predicted to face a public campaign by an activist investor in the near-term. The analysis predicts an uptick in activist focus on the consumer sector, which has until now been falling in attractiveness for activists.
The sixth edition of the study predicts that, following a resetting of the battlefield for activist investors due to the pandemic, there will be a renewed interest in U.K. targets through 2021. Despite a lull in activist campaigns during the first wave of COVID-19, the disruption wrought on the corporate landscape means that “crunch time” is fast-approaching for many companies that have underperformed during the crisis. The AAA also predicts that technology, healthcare and industrials will be the most targeted sectors.
Corporates in the U.K. targeted by activist funds outperformed the market and global peers before and during the pandemic
Authors
FOLLOW & CONNECT WITH A&M