Global Competition Review has recognised A&M in the 2026 GCR 100 rankings. The GCR 100 highlights the world’s best competition practices by providing a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the law firms and economic consultancies doing the most important antitrust work globally.
About A&M’s Competition Economics Services:
A&M has a dedicated economics team to support our clients on complex economic issues arising in high-stakes competition, regulation, and dispute proceedings around the world.
Our economists have provided expert advice across a wide range of sectors, including media and entertainment, aviation, financial services, publishing, digital, maritime transportation and logistics, energy, healthcare and life sciences, and consumer products.
Our services include:
- Abuse of Dominance
- Auctions
- Commercial Damages
- Competition Conduct
- Competition Damages
- Digital Platforms
- Intellectual Property
- M&A
- Privacy
- Regulation
- State Aid
The Evolution of Evidence in Disputes and Investigations: Challenges in Navigating Technological Progress and Global Regulation
May 21, 2026
In this article, Dr. Andreas Tauer and Christoph Hörauf explore how technological change, regulatory complexity, and AI are reshaping evidence in disputes and investigations, the risks introduced by growing volumes of digital data, and the key considerations for maintaining integrity and defensibility.
GIR Guide to Monitorships: Understanding and validating systems, processes and controls relevant to remediation
May 13, 2026
In this chapter of the GIR Guide to Monitorships, forensic professionals detail how organizations test and embed control enhancements to address root causes and drive lasting change.
A Note on the Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Economic Evidence in Assessing Foreign Subsidies
May 7, 2026
The EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) empowers the European Commission (EC) to scrutinise financial support granted by non-EU public authorities to undertakings active in the EU internal market. This note focuses on the impact of the FSR on concentrations.
Experts on the Stand: Brazilian Arbitration Between Judicial Tradition and International Practice
April 30, 2026
In this article, Managing Directors Leonardo Florencio and Rodrigo Mattos analyze why expert evidence in Brazilian arbitration often departs from international best practices, how excessive reliance on tribunal-appointed experts increases cost and delay, and what the ICC Brazil Task Force recommends to improve efficiency and credibility.
