Navigating Golden Parachute Payments During a Change in Control

When a change in control (CIC) is on the horizon, one of the key areas to evaluate is the tax impact of the Golden Parachute rules under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sections 280G.

Alvarez & Marsal’s Compensation and Benefits practice has extensive experience in assessing the tax impact on corporations and employees when golden parachutes are triggered by a CIC of the employer.  Our team can help not only quantify any potential tax exposure, which is often times quite large, but also navigate the various planning alternatives that should be considered to reduce or even eliminate any adverse tax consequences.

280G Change in Control Process

Impact of Section 280G
Employee will be subject to a 20% excise tax on excess parachute payments.
The corporation loses its tax deduction on any excess parachute payments.
To learn more about the Golden Parachute rules, please see our
280G primer here.

 

  • Parachute Payment Calculation: Prior to or in anticipation of an actual CIC, it is critical to identify any parachute payments (such as severance, equity vesting, deal bonuses, health & welfare benefits, etc.) and the amount of any excess parachute payments that would trigger excise tax consequences under various scenarios.  Usually, the various inputs (such as stock price, closing date, etc.) are constantly changing up until (and even after) closing, so sensitivity analyses are oftentimes needed to ascertain when issues may arise for certain employees.
  • Planning Considerations: A&M can identify planning opportunities and implement proven techniques that can help mitigate the excise tax and lost tax deduction.  One common opportunity to mitigate tax consequences under Section 280G is to attribute value to an employee’s non-competition agreement. Alvarez & Marsal’s dedicated tax valuation specialists have in-depth experience conducting valuations of non-competition agreements for Section 280G and understand the sensitivities associated with valuing a non-competition agreement in this context.
  • Employee Communications: The Golden Parachute rules are quite complex and can often lead to confusion and worry from affected individuals in the absence of proper employee communications.  A&M can help navigate when and how to communicate to key employees in an understandable way with minimal tax jargon. A&M’s comprehensive approach and robust experience helps reassure employees that this tax compliance area is being handled with the upmost care.

Learn More:

 

 

 

Learn more about A&M’s Golden Parachute Service Offerings

 

 

 

Discover more insights on Section 280G Excise Tax Planning and Mitigation Alternatives

 

 

 

Explore our 2023/2024 Executive Change in Control Report

 

 

Contact us for assistance with your executive compensation needs:

Request Information

The A&M Approach

Alvarez & Marsal evaluates your executive compensation packages and develops a set of services that best fits the needs of your company and executives. 

 

 

Related Insights
Alvarez & Marsal's (A&M’s) Compensation and Benefits Practice is pleased to share the results of its 2021/2022 Executive Change in Control Report.
This edition of Tax Advisory Weekly explores the key findings of the 2019/2020 Executive Change in Control Report.
Executive compensation continues to be bombarded with scrutiny by shareholders, shareholder advisory firms, politicians and the media. With say-on-pay voting now well established, the voices of shareholders are getting louder, and companies are listening. Many companies have made significant changes to their compensation strategy in recent years to appease stakeholders. In particular, companies have altered their course on benefits provided to executives in connection with a change in control, commonly called "golden parachutes."
Compensation & Benefits: The best way to retain top talent during a merger or acquisition is to get in front of the new compensation plan early.
FOLLOW & CONNECT WITH A&M