According to A&M’s Albert Liguori and Ken Brewer, the use of tax risk insurance has been most prevalent in the mergers and acquisitions context. However, Al and Ken note that they have seen it becoming more common in the context of large corporate groups seeking to manage their global tax risks, regardless of whether they are related to M&A. In either context, the use of tax risk insurance lends itself to captive arrangements, for the same reasons that have caused captive arrangements to be desirable for other types of insurance risks.
Al and Ken published an article in Tax Notes discussing the possibility for the insured to use its own captive insurance company, or a shared captive, for select tax risks.
Click here to read the article.
The New Safe Harbor for Tax Incentives Under Pillar Two: When Tax Incentives can be ‘Qualified’
April 8, 2026
Qualified Tax Incentives in Pillar Two: SBTI Safe Harbor criteria, substance cap, ETR effects, and MNE election mechanics under OECD guidance for MNE groups.
Refinancing in Private Equity: Key Dutch Corporate Tax Considerations in Today’s Market
April 1, 2026
Refinancing has always been an important part of the corporate and private equity landscape. However, in recent years, we have observed an increase in the volume of refinancing activities.
A&M Tax Policy Insights – February 2026
March 26, 2026
A&M Tax Policy Insights covers Pillar One fallout, DST trends, UN talks, and key global tax updates, tariffs, and treaties impacting cross‑border operations.
IRS Creates Limited Opportunity to Revisit “Irrevocable” §163(j) Elections
March 25, 2026
Revenue Procedure 2026-17 creates a limited window to revoke certain “irrevocable” §163(j) elections, including the RPTOB and CFC group elections, in light of OBBBA-driven changes.