With the incoming US administration's announcement of planned tariffs and trade control measures, organizations and investors will need to adapt to a changing regulatory trade landscape to optimize market and policy opportunities. In a recent A&M article, our team discusses key considerations to prepare for anticipated changes including researching probable market impacts and risk, reviewing contracts, implementing Section 301 mitigation strategies and reviewing the supply chain.
How A&M Can Help
- HTS Classification
- Market and Product Research
- Economic Modeling
- Organization and Supply Chain Adaptation
- Product Exception Requests
- Duty Deferral Strategies, Bonded Warehouses and FTZs
- Trade Controls and Sanctions
- Contract Evaluation
Read the full article to discover how A&M's team of experts can help successfully navigate your organization's tariff and trade authority risks.
Read the Full Article Here
The Evolution of Evidence in Disputes and Investigations: Challenges in Navigating Technological Progress and Global Regulation
May 21, 2026
In this article, Dr. Andreas Tauer and Christoph Hörauf explore how technological change, regulatory complexity, and AI are reshaping evidence in disputes and investigations, the risks introduced by growing volumes of digital data, and the key considerations for maintaining integrity and defensibility.
GIR Guide to Monitorships: Understanding and validating systems, processes and controls relevant to remediation
May 13, 2026
In this chapter of the GIR Guide to Monitorships, forensic professionals detail how organizations test and embed control enhancements to address root causes and drive lasting change.
A Note on the Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Economic Evidence in Assessing Foreign Subsidies
May 7, 2026
The EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) empowers the European Commission (EC) to scrutinise financial support granted by non-EU public authorities to undertakings active in the EU internal market. This note focuses on the impact of the FSR on concentrations.
Experts on the Stand: Brazilian Arbitration Between Judicial Tradition and International Practice
April 30, 2026
In this article, Managing Directors Leonardo Florencio and Rodrigo Mattos analyze why expert evidence in Brazilian arbitration often departs from international best practices, how excessive reliance on tribunal-appointed experts increases cost and delay, and what the ICC Brazil Task Force recommends to improve efficiency and credibility.
