Our people United States

Andrew Martin

Senior Director
10+ years conducting research credit studies and Section 199 studies
Focuses on helping clients claim, document and sustain tax incentives, including research tax credits and investment tax credits
Advises Fortune 500 clients in aerospace and defense, financial services, construction and manufacturing
Washington, D.C.
@alvarezmarsal
LinkedIn
Copied!
Andy Martin is a Senior Director with Alvarez & Marsal Tax in Washington, D.C. He brings more than 14 years of public accounting experience in advising corporate clients on federal taxation matters. Mr. Martin focuses on helping clients claim, document and sustain tax incentives, including research tax credits and investment tax credits. He also assists clients with tax planning, tax compliance and examination assistance.

Mr. Martin has advised numerous Fortune 500 clients across a variety of industries, including aerospace and defense, financial services, construction and manufacturing. His experience has ranged from sophisticated multi-year claims to isolated consulting projects.

Prior to joining A&M, Mr. Martin was a manager with Deloitte & Touche and KPMG.

Previously, he was with PricewaterhouseCoopers and Coopers & Lybrand.  

Mr. Martin earned a bachelor's degree in accounting, an MBA, and a J.D. from Indiana University.

Insights By This Professional

Thought Leadership
Research Credit: Understanding the Evolving Playing Field for Contract Research
An insightful look at two recent tax court decisions and the key technical issues raised in the cases.
Thought Leadership
H.R. 11 Could Double Research Credit and Eliminate 2022 Research Expense Amortization Requirement
On October 9, 2020, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee Kevin Brady (R-TX) and House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) introduced H.R. 11,
Thought Leadership
Will the Court Wrench Another Taxpayer “Tooling” Victory in Shiloh Industries?
In a Tax Court petition filed October 22, 2018, Shiloh Industries Inc., a global supplier of automotive parts and a designer and engineer of precision tools, dies, welding, and assembly equipment, is disputing the Internal Revenue Service’s assertion that the company’s claimed tooling expenses in 2012 and 2013 can be treated as qualified research expenses. Will the Tax Court follow its decision in TG Missouri v. Commissioner and allow tooling costs to be treated as supplies used in the conduct of qualified research under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 41(b)?
Thought Leadership
No Money, No Problem: Refundable R&D Tax Credit Opportunities for Startups and “Small” Businesses
The federal research and development tax credit was finally made permanent in late 2015 under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
Latest insights The latest insights from Andrew Martin's team
View more View more insights
Thought Leadership
The Roses Have Wilted and Only a Few Less Thorns—Australia’s Finalised Third Party Debt Test Guidance
Explore the restrictive interpretation of third party debt in Australia's PCG 2025/2, with minimal concessions and a hardline approach by the Commissioner.
Washington, D.C.
Contact me
@alvarezmarsal
LinkedIn
CONTACT US TODAY
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR BULLETIN
Download PDF version
FOLLOW & CONNECT WITH A&M