Challenges and opportunities for eDiscovery in mainland China
Electronic data is a crucial aspect of current litigation and arbitration, due to the complexities of modern financial investigations as well as the need for efficiency in legal practices. This dynamic is driving the traction for electronic discovery (eDiscovery or eDisclosure) in many jurisdictions, including mainland China.
Managing Director Eden Chen discusses the rising demand for eDiscovery in cross-border disputes and the challenges that come along with the process in a recent article in IFLR.
Main Challenges:
- Collecting and transferring data collected outside of mainland China
- Managing electronic files that contain Chinese characters
- Dealing with applications and software developed specifically for the China market
Key Considerations for Conducting eDiscovery in Mainland China:
- Understanding the date period for the matter and determining what data sources should be considered for preservation is crucial
- Forensic data preservation ensures that electronic evidence is collected and preserved in a manner that maintains its integrity and authenticity
- A disclosure protocol guides the procedures that govern the exchange of information among parties involved in a dispute
Read the Full Article
Preventing Financial Blind Spots: The Role of Forensic Accountants in Early Dispute Resolution
March 16, 2026
The right dispute strategy often begins with understanding what the financial evidence can actually support. Senior Director Kelvin Cheong explores how early forensic insight can help parties preserve evidence, assess financial viability, and approach negotiations, arbitration, or litigation with greater clarity and confidence.
Alvarez & Marsal with Transparency International’s CEO Clancy Moore
April 9, 2026
In our latest episode of Conversation with Podcast, Senior Director Michelle Jones is joined by Clancy Moore, CEO of Transparency International Australia.
AI Technology Export Enforcement: 5 Signals Companies Cannot Afford to Miss
April 7, 2026
AI export enforcement is accelerating, bringing tougher penalties, expanding liability, and increased oversight. This article outlines five recent enforcement signals that should prompt an immediate compliance review.
The White House’s AI Legislative Framework and the Unsettled Future of State AI Laws
April 3, 2026
This article examines the Trump administration’s March 20, 2026, “National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence Legislative Recommendations” and the central governance question it raises: Will Congress create a national AI standard that displaces portions of the current state-law patchwork?