Last November, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the formation of a new Procurement Collusion Strike Force (PCSF). The PCSF will focus on “deterring, detecting, investigating and prosecuting antitrust crimes such as bid-rigging conspiracies and related fraudulent schemes, which undermine competition in government procurement, grant and program funding.”
In a new article authored by A&M Managing Director Vincent M. Walden and published by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Vincent explains that most CFEs are already knowledgeable of the various forms of collusion, but it’s helpful for all organizations around the world to evaluate their antifraud programs and risk assessments in line with how the DOJ views collusion — just in case DOJ agents ever come knocking at your door.
Click here for read the full article.
Combating Increased Internal Fraud: Lessons from Recent Cases and Proactive Risk Mitigation Strategies
June 26, 2025
Recent arrests and discoveries of asset misappropriation and financial statement fraud suggest a concerning trend of increasing internal fraud in the Asia–Pacific region.
A Seat with an Expert Series: Jeremy Tilsner (Forensic Technology Edition)
August 5, 2025
In the Seat with an Expert – Forensic Technology Edition series, Managing Director Jeremy Tilsner explores the growing risks associated with artificial intelligence, forecasting a significant rise in both the volume and complexity of fraud.
The Energy Transition in Australia: A Catalyst for Emerging Litigation Risks
July 31, 2025
Australia’s energy transition is creating new opportunities for growth, but also exposing organizations to rising litigation risks tied to land use, project approvals, and misleading ESG claims. The article explores how greenwashing and bluewashing are emerging as key areas of concern, and how forensic accounting can help organizations identify and mitigate these risks.
Digital Forensics in Trade Secret Litigation: The Dual Protection of Technology and Law
July 31, 2025
Digital forensics analysis plays an indispensable role in trade secret litigation. By employing evidence-based collection methods, it not only effectively uncovers infringement but also assists businesses in recovering economic losses.
