Several Alvarez & Marsal Disputes and Investigations professionals have been recognized in the 2017 edition of Who’s Who Legal’s Asset Recovery guide. The guide recognizes experts who are deemed to be leading in international asset recovery by their peers and clients. Seven A&M Disputes and Investigations professionals based in offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia are listed:
Luke Steadman (London)
Julian Jones (London)
Daniel Barton (London)
Keith Williamson (Hong Kong)
Stephen Millington (Dubai)
Laureen Ryan (New York)
Ernest Brod (New York)
About A&M Disputes and Investigations
A&M sets the standard for delivering results on critical matters. With an increase in the complexity of corporate investigations, regulatory enforcement actions, and high stakes litigation and arbitration, that ability is more important than ever. From the boardroom to the court room, A&M professionals draw on their deep skills and experience in business investigations, litigation consulting, forensic technology and expert testimony to provide clients with the solutions they seek to achieve their goals.
For more information on our Disputes and Investigations practice, please click here.
Preventing Financial Blind Spots: The Role of Forensic Accountants in Early Dispute Resolution
March 16, 2026
The right dispute strategy often begins with understanding what the financial evidence can actually support. Senior Director Kelvin Cheong explores how early forensic insight can help parties preserve evidence, assess financial viability, and approach negotiations, arbitration, or litigation with greater clarity and confidence.
Alvarez & Marsal with Transparency International’s CEO Clancy Moore
April 9, 2026
In our latest episode of Conversation with Podcast, Senior Director Michelle Jones is joined by Clancy Moore, CEO of Transparency International Australia.
AI Technology Export Enforcement: 5 Signals Companies Cannot Afford to Miss
April 7, 2026
AI export enforcement is accelerating, bringing tougher penalties, expanding liability, and increased oversight. This article outlines five recent enforcement signals that should prompt an immediate compliance review.
The White House’s AI Legislative Framework and the Unsettled Future of State AI Laws
April 3, 2026
This article examines the Trump administration’s March 20, 2026, “National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence Legislative Recommendations” and the central governance question it raises: Will Congress create a national AI standard that displaces portions of the current state-law patchwork?
