This article was originally published in The Global Arbitration Review
Although it is probably better to refer to an expert as a communicator rather than an advocate, expert opinions do form part of the way a case is advanced, and for this reason, the expert has a role throughout the proceedings.
In the latest Global Arbitration Review, A&M's Luke Steadman aims to identify the expert’s role at each stage of the arbitral process and to discuss how to get the best out of the expert in a way that contributes effectively to the advancement of the case, bearing in mind the expert’s role as a communicator, not an advocate.
Read the full article
Uncovering Missing Information in Liquidation – A Forensic Accounting Perspective
February 25, 2026
This insight outlines several practical approaches from a forensic accounting perspective to uncover and identify missing assets, reconstruct records, and uncover information during liquidation.
Australia's Results Decline in the Latest Corruption Perceptions Index
February 24, 2026
Australia’s drop in the latest Corruption Perceptions Index highlights growing integrity and governance risks amid a broader global decline. What does this mean for organizations, and how can leaders use CPI insights to strengthen risk management and compliance?
Deepfakes and the Shifting Burden of Scrutiny for Litigators
February 19, 2026
The increasing sophistication of AI has made it easy to manipulate evidence, and taking steps to triage evidence with
procedural diligence and technological support has become the litigator's burden.
Delay Analysis: A Mix of Science, Art, and Common Sense
February 17, 2026
Delay analysis supports the tribunal process by setting out the sequence of events and identifying the causes and extent of the delay. Director Moiz Khan explores how delay analysis, when applied as a mix of science, art and common sense, forms reliable expert evidence.
