A&M’s Digital Twin service operationalizes corporate compliance programs and measurably demonstrates compliance effectiveness in line with regulators' expectations. Our end-to-end regulatory and compliance intelligence service gives chief investigators, legal and compliance professionals the ability to drive better business transparency with increased agility, in turn, driving better business performance, cost savings and integrity.
Anti-bribery and anti-corruption Digital Twin addresses the legal and compliance risks in companies' financial data bringing better transparency into:
- Sanctions and trade compliance
- Fraud, waste and abuse
- Third-party risks and improper payments
- Revenue recognition and customer/distributor risks
- Conflicts of interests and segregation of duties
- Employee travel and entertainment
Learn More about A&M's Digital Twin here.
Contact Vincent Walden and Jeremy Tilsner to Learn More
The Evolution of Evidence in Disputes and Investigations: Challenges in Navigating Technological Progress and Global Regulation
May 21, 2026
In this article, Dr. Andreas Tauer and Christoph Hörauf explore how technological change, regulatory complexity, and AI are reshaping evidence in disputes and investigations, the risks introduced by growing volumes of digital data, and the key considerations for maintaining integrity and defensibility.
GIR Guide to Monitorships: Understanding and validating systems, processes and controls relevant to remediation
May 13, 2026
In this chapter of the GIR Guide to Monitorships, forensic professionals detail how organizations test and embed control enhancements to address root causes and drive lasting change.
A Note on the Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Economic Evidence in Assessing Foreign Subsidies
May 7, 2026
The EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) empowers the European Commission (EC) to scrutinise financial support granted by non-EU public authorities to undertakings active in the EU internal market. This note focuses on the impact of the FSR on concentrations.
Experts on the Stand: Brazilian Arbitration Between Judicial Tradition and International Practice
April 30, 2026
In this article, Managing Directors Leonardo Florencio and Rodrigo Mattos analyze why expert evidence in Brazilian arbitration often departs from international best practices, how excessive reliance on tribunal-appointed experts increases cost and delay, and what the ICC Brazil Task Force recommends to improve efficiency and credibility.
