Fast-Tracking Finance: Decision Making for Back-Office Consolidations
The recent economic recession is pushing many organizations to re-examine operations, enhance productivity and reduce costs. This strategy shift comes on the heels of more than 20 years of efforts directed at driving enterprise value and streamlining cost structures by implementing shared services for back-office functions such as finance and accounting, information services, human resources, sales operations and legal. The results are well documented, with average cost reductions of 10 percent to 30 percent1 of baseline functional costs – which also positioned organizations to proportionally support growth. But what have these experiences taught us about how best to achieve these benefits?
Whether you are a multibillion-dollar company with a proven track record of driving enterprise value through shared services or a company just beginning your journey, the experience of the last two decades has uncovered several key considerations and lessons learned from building the case for change, assessing the existing organizational model, and designing and implementing the shared service organization.
Building the Case for Change
The business case defines the current state baseline and economic justification for moving forward with shared services. When building such a case, it is important to keep the following key considerations in mind:
Developing a Plan
While shared services can drive material benefits, it is not the “silver bullet” to address all issues. Even though the initial business case may show an economic justification, this does not mean the achievement is a foregone conclusion. Assessing the existing business operating model, market conditions, potential customer or labor implications, and defining how the organization will be governed, will help determine if shared services makes “business” and economic sense. Some key conditions should be considered before deciding to move to shared services, although the absence of these conditions does not necessarily mean that you will be unsuccessful; it reflects an increased challenge to achieving the targeted benefits.

If there is ample business justification and the company is conducive to shared services, designing an organization and process structure that supports your existing structure, while increasing efficiency and enhancing scalability, is critical. Implementation then focuses on executing the design, managing the people-related process and defining the critical governance model to drive efficient performance and optimal service levels. Some key guidelines include:
Conclusion
Many successful shared service implementations have taken place over the past two decades, but there are also many that struggled to achieve the benefits stream they sought. Lessons can be learned through both successes and failures. So heed this advice:
In this way, shared services will yield defined benefits.
Conor Johnston, Manager, is the author of this story.
Footnote
1 Alvarez & Marsal experience; actual savings dependent on scope and scale of shared services organization